Routing Slip
从 4.1 版本开始,Spring Integration 提供了 routing slip 企业集成模式的实现。它作为 routingSlip
消息标头实现,用于确定 AbstractMessageProducingHandler
实例中的下一个通道,而没有为端点指定 outputChannel
。当消息到达没有 output-channel
的端点时,将查询 routingSlip
以确定将消息发送到的下一个通道。当路由单耗尽时,正常的 replyChannel
处理将恢复。
Starting with version 4.1, Spring Integration provides an implementation of the routing slip enterprise integration pattern.
It is implemented as a routingSlip
message header, which is used to determine the next channel in AbstractMessageProducingHandler
instances, when an outputChannel
is not specified for the endpoint.
This pattern is useful in complex, dynamic cases, when it can become difficult to configure multiple routers to determine message flow.
When a message arrives at an endpoint that has no output-channel
, the routingSlip
is consulted to determine the next channel to which the message is sent.
When the routing slip is exhausted, normal replyChannel
processing resumes.
路由单据的配置作为 HeaderEnricher
选项呈现——一个由分号分隔的路由单据,它包含 path
条目,如下例所示:
Configuration for the routing slip is presented as a HeaderEnricher
option — a semicolon-separated routing slip that contains path
entries, as the following example shows:
<util:properties id="properties">
<beans:prop key="myRoutePath1">channel1</beans:prop>
<beans:prop key="myRoutePath2">request.headers[myRoutingSlipChannel]</beans:prop>
</util:properties>
<context:property-placeholder properties-ref="properties"/>
<header-enricher input-channel="input" output-channel="process">
<routing-slip
value="${myRoutePath1}; @routingSlipRoutingPojo.get(request, reply);
routingSlipRoutingStrategy; ${myRoutePath2}; finishChannel"/>
</header-enricher>
上例具有:
The preceding example has:
-
A
<context:property-placeholder>
configuration to demonstrate that the entries in the routing slippath
can be specified as resolvable keys. -
The
<header-enricher>
<routing-slip>
sub-element is used to populate theRoutingSlipHeaderValueMessageProcessor
to theHeaderEnricher
handler. -
The
RoutingSlipHeaderValueMessageProcessor
accepts aString
array of resolved routing slippath
entries and returns (fromprocessMessage()
) asingletonMap
with thepath
askey
and0
as initialroutingSlipIndex
.
路由单据 path
条目可以包含 MessageChannel
Bean 名称、RoutingSlipRouteStrategy
Bean 名称和 Spring 表达式 (SpEL)。RoutingSlipHeaderValueMessageProcessor
在第一次 processMessage
调用时根据 BeanFactory
检查每个路由单据 path
条目。它将条目(其不是应用程序上下文中 Bean 名称)转换为 ExpressionEvaluatingRoutingSlipRouteStrategy
实例。RoutingSlipRouteStrategy
条目多次调用,直到它们返回 null
或空 String
为止。
Routing Slip path
entries can contain MessageChannel
bean names, RoutingSlipRouteStrategy
bean names, and Spring expressions (SpEL).
The RoutingSlipHeaderValueMessageProcessor
checks each routing slip path
entry against the BeanFactory
on the first processMessage
invocation.
It converts entries (which are not bean names in the application context) to ExpressionEvaluatingRoutingSlipRouteStrategy
instances.
RoutingSlipRouteStrategy
entries are invoked multiple times, until they return null or an empty String
.
由于路由单参与了 getOutputChannel
流程,因此我们有一个请求回复上下文。已经引入了 RoutingSlipRouteStrategy
来确定下一个 outputChannel
,该 outputChannel
使用 requestMessage
和 reply
对象。此策略的实现应在应用程序上下文中注册为一个 bean,它的 Bean 名称用于路由单 path
。提供了 ExpressionEvaluatingRoutingSlipRouteStrategy
实现。它接受 SpEL 表达式,并将内部 ExpressionEvaluatingRoutingSlipRouteStrategy.RequestAndReply
对象用作求值上下文的根对象。这样做是为了避免为每次 ExpressionEvaluatingRoutingSlipRouteStrategy.getNextPath()
调用创建 EvaluationContext
的开销。它是一个简单的 Java bean,具有两个属性:Message<?> request
和 Object reply
。利用这种表达式实现,我们可以使用 SpEL 指定路由单 path
条目(例如 @routingSlipRoutingPojo.get(request, reply)
和 request.headers[myRoutingSlipChannel]
),且无需为 RoutingSlipRouteStrategy
定义 bean。
Since the routing slip is involved in the getOutputChannel
process, we have a request-reply context.
The RoutingSlipRouteStrategy
has been introduced to determine the next outputChannel
that uses the requestMessage
and the reply
object.
An implementation of this strategy should be registered as a bean in the application context, and its bean name is used in the routing slip path
.
The ExpressionEvaluatingRoutingSlipRouteStrategy
implementation is provided.
It accepts a SpEL expression and an internal ExpressionEvaluatingRoutingSlipRouteStrategy.RequestAndReply
object is used as the root object of the evaluation context.
This is to avoid the overhead of EvaluationContext
creation for each ExpressionEvaluatingRoutingSlipRouteStrategy.getNextPath()
invocation.
It is a simple Java bean with two properties: Message<?> request
and Object reply
.
With this expression implementation, we can specify routing slip path
entries by using SpEL (for example, @routingSlipRoutingPojo.get(request, reply)
and request.headers[myRoutingSlipChannel]
) and avoid defining a bean for the RoutingSlipRouteStrategy
.
|
The |
如果在分布式环境中涉及路由单据,我们建议不要对路由单据 path
使用行内表达式。此建议适用于分布式环境,例如在消息代理(如 AMQP Support 或 JMS Support)中使用 request-reply
的跨 JVM 应用程序,或在集成流中使用持久 MessageStore
(Message Store)。框架使用 RoutingSlipHeaderValueMessageProcessor
将它们转换为 ExpressionEvaluatingRoutingSlipRouteStrategy
对象,并在 routingSlip
消息头中使用它们。由于此类不是 Serializable
(它不可能是,因为它依赖于 BeanFactory
),因此整个 Message
将变为不可序列化且在任何分布式操作中,我们最终都会得到 NotSerializableException
。要克服此限制,请在 ExpressionEvaluatingRoutingSlipRouteStrategy
中使用期望的 SpEL 注册一个 bean,并在路由单据 path
配置中使用它的 bean 名称。
If a routing slip is involved in a distributed environment, we recommend not using inline expressions for the Routing Slip path
.
This recommendation applies to distributed environments such as cross-JVM applications, using a request-reply
through a message broker (such asAMQP Support or JMS Support), or using a persistent MessageStore
(Message Store) in the integration flow.
The framework uses RoutingSlipHeaderValueMessageProcessor
to convert them to ExpressionEvaluatingRoutingSlipRouteStrategy
objects, and they are used in the routingSlip
message header.
Since this class is not Serializable
(it cannot be, because it depends on the BeanFactory
), the entire Message
becomes non-serializable and, in any distributed operation, we end up with a NotSerializableException
.
To overcome this limitation, register an ExpressionEvaluatingRoutingSlipRouteStrategy
bean with the desired SpEL and use its bean name in the routing slip path
configuration.
对于 Java 配置,可以将 RoutingSlipHeaderValueMessageProcessor
实例添加到 HeaderEnricher
Bean 定义中,如下例所示:
For Java configuration, you can add a RoutingSlipHeaderValueMessageProcessor
instance to the HeaderEnricher
bean definition, as the following example shows:
@Bean
@Transformer(inputChannel = "routingSlipHeaderChannel")
public HeaderEnricher headerEnricher() {
return new HeaderEnricher(Collections.singletonMap(IntegrationMessageHeaderAccessor.ROUTING_SLIP,
new RoutingSlipHeaderValueMessageProcessor("myRoutePath1",
"@routingSlipRoutingPojo.get(request, reply)",
"routingSlipRoutingStrategy",
"request.headers[myRoutingSlipChannel]",
"finishChannel")));
}
当一个端点生成应答且未定义 outputChannel
时,路由单据算法的工作方式如下:
The routing slip algorithm works as follows when an endpoint produces a reply and no outputChannel
has been defined:
-
The
routingSlipIndex
is used to get a value from the routing slippath
list. -
If the value from
routingSlipIndex
isString
, it is used to get a bean fromBeanFactory
. -
If a returned bean is an instance of
MessageChannel
, it is used as the nextoutputChannel
and theroutingSlipIndex
is incremented in the reply message header (the routing slippath
entries remain unchanged). -
If a returned bean is an instance of
RoutingSlipRouteStrategy
and itsgetNextPath
does not return an emptyString
, that result is used as a bean name for the nextoutputChannel
. TheroutingSlipIndex
remains unchanged. -
If
RoutingSlipRouteStrategy.getNextPath
returns an emptyString
ornull
, theroutingSlipIndex
is incremented and thegetOutputChannelFromRoutingSlip
is invoked recursively for the next Routing Slippath
item. -
If the next routing slip
path
entry is not aString
, it must be an instance ofRoutingSlipRouteStrategy
. -
When the
routingSlipIndex
exceeds the size of the routing slippath
list, the algorithm moves to the default behavior for the standardreplyChannel
header.